Writing winning abstracts

An abstract provides a summary of the key information from a full-length research publication. When written effectively, abstracts should provide sufficient information to allow readers to have a thorough understanding of the research and its outcomes without reading the whole paper. This allows readers to efficiently classify papers as relevant or not relevant to their interests.

What makes a winning abstract submission?

What are common features of effective abstracts? And which common pitfalls should you avoid...?

A good abstract will…

• Adhere to ALL of the submission criteria as outlined in the abstract guidance documents
• Be an accurate reflection of the research study, ensuring that information is featured in the correct section:
  • The introduction clearly describes the background and states the purpose of the study in the form of the research problem
  • The aims are relevant and have been addressed by the study
  • There is sufficient information about the method(s) used e.g. sampling strategy, response rate, ethical considerations, etc.
  • The results are clearly articulated in the context of the study aim
  • The discussion is clearly articulated in the wider context
  • The conclusions are appropriate and based on the results

• Be well written, using clear and concise language and appropriate style, i.e. using:
  • A professional, academic writing style
  • The past tense
  • The expanded form of abbreviations and acronyms when first referred to
  • Proofread on at least two occasions prior to submission.

Common pitfalls

Our Abstract Review Committee has listed the most common reasons for abstract rejection: